Proposed review process
The planned procedure begins with an editorial check of subject suitability, file completeness and compliance with submission instructions. Manuscripts that pass this stage may proceed to scholarly evaluation by specialists.
Assessment criteria
Review may consider the relevance of the problem, originality of the contribution, methodological coherence, clarity of results and acknowledgement of limitations. Comments should support the decision and, where appropriate, help improve the manuscript.
Decision and revisions
Editorial decisions and requests for changes will be communicated through the platform. Authors’ responses should explain the changes made.
Still to be defined: anonymity model, number of reviewers, timelines and final decision criteria.